About rights

 I think that rights should usually be estimated each time anew, instead of basing them on old estimates. One reason is that identity thefts are quite common, and another reason is thst the skills, values, motivation etc of indkviduals vary and may change quite much across the years. Likewise the social relationship change acrosd time and situations too vary and change across time. 

Skills and values often get influencies from recent social company and from one's identity as a member of some groups etc. For examole their perspectives used in discussion or their skill levels, approaches to thibgs etc may affe t what the world looks like. 

Identity thefts are often supported by the claim of getting fair chances in life, which maybe refers to times when slme groups were absent from education etc, so those studying there might have spoken for some good ideas of those without such educatiln or job or social company. But when people in prinviple have fair righrs, then those other kibds of people are typically with other skills and values, and so they shoukd not be confused with those having thst profession's skills, values, picture of the world, etc. And likewise in human relatiln it is good to k ow who is like what. 

As young adult people maybe feel that in principle they have many possibilities in life, but as older they have been disappointed with many options, and so they no longer are so eager to meet all the same old social relations or relatives or some other cjouces no llngef apply, for example some worni g places demand different qualitues than what thry tjought as young. 

*

See also the previous post https://learntalents3.blogspot.com/2024/07/basics-of-getting-room-to-live-in.html 

* 

As young I heard my parents and also as young adult some parents of young chilfren say thst they did not get any room to live in before they stole their children's rights. That is weird but may be common. It sounds like they maybe marked themselves as skilled and sure as possible, instead of trying to be honest in estimating sizes, the real sourced of each followed piece of wisdlm, each person's own syrenghts, the needs of living in a civiliced society, etc, snd try if there were rights connected with less boisterous wording and ln the other hand possible well noticed interests marked ok. 

Can it be that a baby or a child kind of cultivates for oneself possible areas of life, like hobbies, jobs, interests, skills of comfortable areas of life, etc. And that is somehow mistaken on some ocvult side as the society's picture of the world. But the child or a baby has as if on a side a view that the picture of the world and the areas of lufe of others are on a wider area, and it is ok for others to live according to their own pictures of the world and likings etc, as long as such is ok in the society,ok from the point of view of the civiluced pictures of the world of others too.