Some social skills: "me for you", or "side by side"

 In close relationships like family or with people one wants as friends, "me arranging this for you" belongs to helping tge less skilled or ill. Otgerwuse it is a burden, since usually it does not alliw tge other one enough personal room to live in, to do things in obe's own ways. Even when there is some wisdom of lufe quaranteeing that it ought to go ok, it often happens that such somehow does not communicated well enough. 

So between skilled enough individuals it is better to do things as if "side by side": watching the things at hand, thinkibg them through in one's picture of tge world, lufe experience, wisdom of lufe and skills plus kniwledge about effects of work rythm, division of labour in tasks, etc. Since each one needs one's own life, but also some basic arrangements, and can share at least some info of what one lijes and what not, and how to share labour if tgere are some not liked tasks, and is there sny wusdom of life or lufe skills which woukd help in the tasks. So it ought to ve pissible to aim for free good lufe for each, in ways tgat are good in the world too, good for the wirld, for lufe i  it in the long run. So side by side lookibg obe coukd lije work conrades get arrangements for the shared lufe and freedom for each for their hobbues, own lijed wise enough things and social life, etc, for example their drwams of a future profession. Making suggestions, throwing good wisdom of life to the air, but leaving the other ones the freedom to decide by themselves, how they do - if they do not hurt on purpise, for example by doing some labour in verh unwise ways just when others are doing something impirtant for them. So lots of freedom for all, in ways that are good for the world, for exampke fair, is the goal.