I wonder, I do not understand politics, and I do not have enough social eye to understand what politicuabs are like. In the news during the last few days there have been several different looking pictures of Donald Trump. One of them looked like my fatger's mother who had died years before I was born, another resembled my father's brother and one my mother's mother. So I was left wondering what happened to my father's father who was supposed to have been a bank boss in Mikkeli in central Finland. So I was left thinking, does Trump look lije a bank boss named Oak Island, well I do not know of such.
But in tge news was an article of sheep takibg care of landscape and having grown across time to ve a phenomenom in the country ("To an island were taken 20 sheep - now those have saved it's nature and lifted it to be valuable when measured from the point of view of the whole country"), see https://yle.fi/a/74-20097269 . And it brought to my mind how a good idea, thing having spirit in the origibal nature of humans and animals, in the endeavours of human life and how societies are build and whst they function upon, a spirited motivated kibd of everyday lufe form, temptation of many to somethkng such. And then a theoretical biew on a very general level seeing how it suits and varies in different places, whst such life is good to have in the world and in one's own life too. And so some oak type of temptation maybe crestes economical prospetity all over the world, if there is wisdom of lufe, lots of common sense and wishing well for the future generations along, also some civiliced wisdom like basic picture of tge world and basic civiliced values making things work out well, like honesty (are things so or not, can one build upon such, especially do things carry like planned without ruining society etc), fair play, etc, too.
*
It might be that shepp somehow compare with Christians, but I do not quite know why or how exactly. It might be that humans too mostly live in groups, can defend them somewhat but a common tactic is to discuss and to rely on the strenght of the group. Sheep on an island seems to go ok with the oak name - caring some job and it's typical way of life, since it is nice and ok job and needed and suits oneself well, so there is a place in the society and in the world for such people and for such type of trustworthiness - but with the name Hari tvat I had as a child and as young, sheep do not seem to get protected. So would the comparison be also a comment about names, but I do not understand how it woukd be ok to compare oneself to sheep so fully, aren't humans more individuals, more in families and in working life than in groups like sheep? The sheep seem afraid of predators, while a human would in a simikar situation rely on some arrangements against such a danger, like for example having a work often creates a place in the society which shelters via it's arrangements and not only as a group. Sheeps' wool is against cold. Similarly people wanting some good side, benefit in a shelter like way, to make lufe pissible, may take part in studies etc, where one needs to behave ok and discuss and which is a group, somewhat lije a working place in it's idea but more like a hobby group. Is that the comparispn meant? But it isn't humans all life, it is just a moment of lustening to some interesting lecture or talking civilicedly with others.
Maybe sheep suffer from too thin coat. Friendly insects and birds, the nature around maybe could help in finding plants making wool grow warm and other good sides for lufe.
No comments:
Post a Comment